In view of the fact that the greatest weakness of the howitzers lay in the trunnions, and since surviving examples of
the light howitzers bear two different trunnion diameters, it is logical to believe that the last four pieces cast in
1792 had the heavier, though still insufficient, trunnions. Following the entry of the four howitzers, and two carriages
for same, there is under the same date an item of $11.00 for "lettering howitzer carriages & painting covers." Another
entry mentions "white lead and Prussion[sic] blue for carriages," but since the term carriage was generally used at that
time in reference to anything with wheels, it is not certain that this paint was used on the 2 3/4-inch howitzer carriages.
The most complete account of the trials of the light howitzers is found in a letter General Wayne wrote to the Secretary of War on 15 January 1793. Here, too, is the first reference to the heavier type:
Regarding carriages for the howitzers, all that is known is that they were a type of wheeled carriage. The first carriages were too lightly ironed,16 and experiments were going on from time to time in an effort to improve them. Wayne, writing to Knox again from Legion Ville on 31 January, tells of Colonel Procter's work with the carriages:
Three weeks later, at the request of Knox, Wayne submitted a report discussing the defects of the howitzers. This report has not been found, but on the same date, Wayne requested that the Secretary order sixteen new howitzers, of the same caliber18 but of a new design, "agreeable to the enclosed proportions." This plan has not been found either, but from examination of existing pieces, it is obvious that it must have showed a design like that of the heavier howitzers. Wayne's fondness19 for the little howitzers, which by now he was affectionately calling his "Flying Howitzers," was again evidenced by his statement that they were "the only kind of Artillery than[sic] can be transported with ease & used with effect against savages in a Mountainous Country cover'd with Wood & without the benefit of Roads."20 Numerous bits of correspondence dated early in March mention the new lot of howitzers to be cast, yet they shed little light on the matter. They do make clear the fact that Colonel Procter was much involved with the howitzers, and was probably more familiar with their use and construction than any other person. Wayne wished that Procter could be in Philadelphia with Knox "in order to superintend & expedite the Casting & marking (?) the improved howitzers,"21 and he informed Knox that Procter could give him any necessary information that was needed respecting them. The Colonel, in the meantime was instructing the young, inexperienced artillery officers in the use of the howitzers, and in the work of the Ordnance Laboratory, where they were preparing the shells and portfires.22 On 9 March an entry was made in the quartermaster record book estimating the cost of the 16 new howitzers at 144 pounds, and the cost of 16 carriages at exactly the same figure.23 It seems unlikely that the cost of a tube should equal exactly the cost of the carriage. Possibly the clerk entering the items received only a total figure, as seen on the first lot of cannon, and wanting to show two separate items, divided the total in half. | ||
Back Next |